In an interview with The Telegraph, Donald Trump described his stance on NATO as firm, saying his relationship with the alliance is “beyond reconsideration.” He expressed long-standing skepticism, calling NATO weak and suggesting that even Vladimir Putin views it similarly.

At the same time, Marco Rubio signaled that the U.S. could reassess its role in the alliance. Speaking to Fox News, he argued that NATO risks becoming unbalanced if member countries rely on U.S. military protection while limiting access to their own bases when American interests are involved, raising questions about the fairness of the partnership.

Trump also connected his position to tensions involving Greenland. In an online video, he suggested the issue began there, expressing frustration that Denmark refused to consider selling the territory, though he did not expand further on the claim.

These remarks have sparked strong reactions. Critics warn that weakening NATO—established in 1949 to ensure collective defense among 32 nations—could threaten global stability. Supporters, however, argue that the U.S. should remain only in alliances that clearly serve its national interests.

Public opinion remains divided. Some believe the U.S. should not bear the bulk of defense responsibilities without full cooperation from allies, while others caution that stepping back from NATO could carry serious geopolitical consequences. For now, it remains unclear whether any withdrawal will happen, but the discussion highlights growing tensions over the alliance’s future and its role for the United States.